Telephone: (312) 621-9000

WHY CHOOSE GLO

GLO approaches every case with the attitude that winning is the only option, and coupled with developing a teamwork relationship with our clients, we have achieved substantial success for GLO's clients.

Some of the verdicts and settlements Grossman Law Offices has obtained for its clients
include:

Roto-Zip (RRK Holdings) v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorable jury verdict and judgment - $25,000,000
MEPCAD v. Tyco/Simplex Grinnell
Clark County District Court, Nevada
Favorable jury verdict and judgment - $12,000,000
TriMed, Inc. v. Stryker Corporation
U.S. District Court, Central District California
Favorably settled on eve of trial after defeating summary judgments (terms confidential)
Environmental Brake Systems v. Illinois Tool Works
U.S. District Court, Southern District California
Favorably settled for $5,000,000 on eve of trial after defeating summary judgment
NextAlarm Monitoring Service, Inc. v. Uplink Security, LLC
U.S. District Court, Central District California
Favorable early settlement for client (terms confidential)
Webco Industries, Inc. v. Thermatool Corp.
U.S. District Court, Northern District Oklahoma
Jury verdict, $1,200,000, affirmed on appeal
Skorr Products, Inc. v. Serv-Rite, Inc.
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Favorably settled
Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. Vanguard Products Group, Inc.
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Won summary judgment for invalidity, affirmed on appeal.
OMNI-ID USA, Inc. v. Metalcraft, Inc.
U.S. District Court, Western District of New York
Favorably settled
Mandaric Cycles v. Retul, Inc.
U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
Favorably settled
Lakeside Plastics, Inc. v. Traffix Devices, Inc.
U.S. District Court, Central District California
Won summary judgment for noninfringment, affirmed on appeal.
Vanguard Products Group v. Diam International
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled after winning summary judgment for infringement and defeating
summary judgment for invalidity (terms confidential).
Ortho-Tain, Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Inc.
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment motion (terms confidential)
Everything Baseball v. Wilson Sporting Goods, Inc.
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment motion (terms confidential)
First Graphics v. MEPCAD
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Won summary judgment for noninfringement, affirmed on appeal
Telefonix, Inc. v. MBM Technologies, Ltd.
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment (terms confidential)
Gummow v. Snap-on Tools, Inc.
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled after winning summary judgment for infringement and defeating
summary judgment for invalidity (terms confidential)
Pelican Golf, Inc. v. Karsten Manufacturing Corp. (Ping Golf)
U.S. District Court, Southern District Ohio
Favorably settled after favorable Markman hearing and defeating summary
judgment for invalidity (terms confidential)
Chapman v. Trendmasters, Inc.
U.S. District Court, District Arizona
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment (terms confidential)
Perfection Spring & Stamping v. Exacto Spring Corporation
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment (terms confidential)
Saint Switch, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled (terms confidential)