WHY CHOOSE GLO
GLO approaches every case with the attitude that winning is the only option, and coupled with developing a teamwork relationship with our clients, we have achieved substantial success for GLO's clients.
Some of the verdicts and settlements Grossman Law Offices has obtained for its clients
include:
Roto-Zip (RRK Holdings) v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorable jury verdict and judgment - $25,000,000
MEPCAD v. Tyco/Simplex Grinnell
Favorable jury verdict and judgment - $25,000,000
Clark County District Court, Nevada
Favorable jury verdict and judgment - $12,000,000
TriMed, Inc. v. Stryker Corporation
Favorable jury verdict and judgment - $12,000,000
U.S. District Court, Central District California
Favorably settled on eve of trial after defeating summary judgments (terms confidential)
Andover Healthcare v. Johnson & Johnson
Favorably settled on eve of trial after defeating summary judgments (terms confidential)
U.S. District of Massachusetts (terms confidential)
Favorably settled during discovery
Environmental Brake Systems v. Illinois Tool Works
Favorably settled during discovery
U.S. District Court, Southern District California
Favorably settled on the eve of trial after defeating summary judgment.
Andover Healthcare v. 3M
Favorably settled on the eve of trial after defeating summary judgment.
U.S. District Court, District of Delaware (terms confidential)
Favorably settled on eve of trial after defeating summary judgment
NextAlarm Monitoring Service, Inc. v. Uplink Security, LLC
Favorably settled on eve of trial after defeating summary judgment
U.S. District Court, Central District California
Favorable early settlement for client (terms confidential)
Webco Industries, Inc. v. Thermatool Corp.
Favorable early settlement for client (terms confidential)
U.S. District Court, Northern District Oklahoma
Jury verdict, $1,200,000, affirmed on appeal
Skorr Products, Inc. v. Serv-Rite, Inc.Jury verdict, $1,200,000, affirmed on appeal
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Favorably settled
Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. Vanguard Products Group, Inc.
Favorably settled
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Won summary judgment for invalidity, affirmed on appeal.
OMNI-ID USA, Inc. v. Metalcraft, Inc.
Won summary judgment for invalidity, affirmed on appeal.
U.S. District Court, Western District of New York
Favorably settled
Mandaric Cycles v. Retul, Inc.
Favorably settled
U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
Favorably settled
Lakeside Plastics, Inc. v. Traffix Devices, Inc.
Favorably settled
U.S. District Court, Central District California
Won summary judgment for noninfringment, affirmed on appeal.
Vanguard Products Group v. Diam International
Won summary judgment for noninfringment, affirmed on appeal.
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled after winning summary judgment for infringement and defeating
summary judgment for invalidity (terms confidential).
Ortho-Tain, Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Orthodontics, Inc.
Favorably settled after winning summary judgment for infringement and defeating
summary judgment for invalidity (terms confidential).
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment motion (terms confidential)
Everything Baseball v. Wilson Sporting Goods, Inc.
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment motion (terms confidential)
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment motion (terms confidential)
First Graphics v. MEPCAD
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment motion (terms confidential)
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Won summary judgment for noninfringement, affirmed on appeal
Telefonix, Inc. v. MBM Technologies, Ltd.
Won summary judgment for noninfringement, affirmed on appeal
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment (terms confidential)
Gummow v. Snap-on Tools, Inc.
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment (terms confidential)
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled after winning summary judgment for infringement and defeating
summary judgment for invalidity (terms confidential)
Pelican Golf, Inc. v. Karsten Manufacturing Corp.
(Ping Golf)
Favorably settled after winning summary judgment for infringement and defeating
summary judgment for invalidity (terms confidential)
U.S. District Court, Southern District Ohio
Favorably settled after favorable Markman hearing and defeating summary
judgment for invalidity (terms confidential)
Chapman v. Trendmasters, Inc.
Favorably settled after favorable Markman hearing and defeating summary
judgment for invalidity (terms confidential)
U.S. District Court, District Arizona
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment (terms confidential)
Perfection Spring & Stamping v. Exacto Spring Corporation
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment (terms confidential)
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment (terms confidential)
Saint Switch, Inc. v. General Motors Corporation
Favorably settled after defeating summary judgment (terms confidential)
U.S. District Court, Northern District Illinois
Favorably settled (terms confidential)
Favorably settled (terms confidential)